(October 9, 2018 at 8:37 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:(October 9, 2018 at 3:58 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Perhaps I was mistaken about you in that respect. If I was Huggy-like, I would track down every kudos you ever gave a fellow theist who used the ontological argument (SteveII comes to mind) to play gotcha. But I don’t care enough to do it. If you say you are not impressed by that line of reasoning, I’ll take you at face value. And agree.Too bad the cosmological argument is just as bad as is the moral argument
It's not AS bad. We do have ways of verifying (with some possibility of error) that the universe began to exist. That's one demonstrable premise, as opposed to zero demonstrable premises for the moral argument.
... okay, fine, it's still terrible.
Being an antipistevist is like being an antipastovist, only with epistemic responsibility instead of bruschetta.
Ignore list includes: 1 douche bag (Drich)
Ignore list includes: 1 douche bag (Drich)