(October 11, 2018 at 11:48 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:(October 11, 2018 at 11:06 am)SteveII Wrote: Off the top of my head: Plutarch is not attesting to the events he writes about. In his defense it was 400 years earlier.
So...that's actually 401 reasons.
So if he was attesting to the events he writes about and it was 50 years earlier, that would be 50 reasons. Are you willing to apply that reasoning elsewhere?
The answer I gave was 'reasons' why Plutach's writing was different than the NT docs. I rounded.