(October 11, 2018 at 12:26 pm)SteveII Wrote: The answer I gave was 'reasons' why Plutach's writing was different than the NT docs. I rounded.
In other words, each year does not count as a 'reason' and you would never accept that line of thought as a valid reason to discredit a writing you accept. You were going for a funny.
[/quote]
Yes! It is part of the joy of talking to Grand. He get's kudos just for telling me I'm wrong and I get to amuse myself with comments I am sure are going over his head. A win-win.