(September 24, 2011 at 2:36 pm)MilesTailsPrower Wrote: with science we figured out it was tectonic plates that caused volcanoes to erupt in certain parts of the world. With a greater more logical reasoning on how the universe works there is no need for a god.
Thanks for your civil reply and your good example.
This is what logic says:
There was a man walking in the street, suddenly a stone falled upon his head and died. Who throw the stone? It is not a condition that the stone were thrown, may be by itself or by chance.
There was a man walking in the street ans suddenly a shot penetrated exactly his heart. Who shot him? Is it a condition that there must be someone who shot him?
Yes, there must be someone.
So brother, returning to your logical example, science is the shot becase it is defined rules.
As long as there is a reason, there must be The Doer. If there is no reason, then you can say "by chance".
You said the reason is tectonic plates that erupt volcanoes, this is a break of the restrict rule which is that the earth is stable and when the rule is broken, it was with another rule which is tectonic plates.
When you find no stable earth and no organization and no nature and no rules and no science and nothing at all then this is the falled stone "the chance of evolution".
When you find nature, rules and science to study and expect thefuture and the natural written phases and interactions, then there must be The Doer, The Creator.
Quote: What difference does it make if I don't believe in a god or your god? Maybe it's the teaching of the religion you are acquainted to that calls for being ignorant towards someones set of beliefs or lack thereof.
The difference is that when you buy something, you aare it owner and you do what ever you want with it. But when you make something with your own hands, you control every part of it and make everything for a purpose, We are slaves to Him. He granted us free will yet set His rules and in the Afterlife is The Day of Judgment.
