RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
October 17, 2018 at 10:34 am
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2018 at 10:40 am by OakTree500.)
(October 17, 2018 at 10:06 am)SteveII Wrote: 1) Saying that miracles are not an accepted fact is question begging. What kind of miracle-seeking experiment would make any logical sense? The very definition of a miracle has in it the a) inability to predict and b) the all-important feature that you can only see the effect--never the cause--something that throws a monkey wrench in experiments. I never said I would not look for counter-evidence=straw man.
You can't win this debate. You would have to prove my worldview wrong.
Well, no. You're the one claiming it's true, so you have to prove that it's correct. As always, that's the burden of proof.
The problem is with "Miracles", in the billions [or thousands if that's your belief] of years that the earth has been in existence, and all these supposed miracles that have happened, why has it never happened to a scientist?
You supposed god knows that atheists are questioning it, why not perform a miracle and turn all our science books into bibles in front of our very eyes? Better yet, why not just physically appear in the sky right now, and tell us it's real?
You say "oh well you can't predict a miracle etc etc" well that's bull shit I say. You're only "proof" they EVER happened is in the NT and OT. Without that, you have nothing, other than the word of crazy people who say they've seen something that they haven't.
Steve, with said burden, you have to prove yourself right.
"Be Excellent To Each Other"
