But IF the reasons ARE valid because he IS telling the truth, then they're evidence of him telling the truth.
So in that case you would be believing with evidence - and rationally.
And IF the reasons are NOT valid and he's LYING instead - then they're obviously NOT evidence of him telling the truth (for a start - because he's LYING!).
So in that case you would be believing 'on faith' - and IRrationally.
EvF
So in that case you would be believing with evidence - and rationally.
And IF the reasons are NOT valid and he's LYING instead - then they're obviously NOT evidence of him telling the truth (for a start - because he's LYING!).
So in that case you would be believing 'on faith' - and IRrationally.
EvF