RE: Madeiline McCann coverup
October 28, 2018 at 10:14 am
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2018 at 10:26 am by robvalue.)
(October 28, 2018 at 9:45 am)Kit Wrote: Rob is not a conspiracy nut. OMG.
Grow the fuck up, people.
Thank you! If people won’t even check out a video clip before deciding that, after knowing me for some time, then the media really does have its talons in deep.
I’ve been watching hours of more videos, from lots of different people. I only pay attention to those who evidence their points, which is most of them. Much of the evidence is in the public domain. The original Portuguese police records can be accessed by anyone.
I am completely at a loss how operation Grange can warrant a further £12 million pounds of public tax payer's money, when it has so far produced absolutely nothing, because it refuses to consider anything except one very specific scenario. It looks to me far more like a continued attempt to pretend to investigate, while protecting those in high places who have something to lose if the McCanns go down. I’m pretty sure I know what that is by now. The connections surrounding the case are astonishing. I won’t mention the ugliness by name, but it’s probably apparent by now to anyone who has been looking into it.
My hypothesis is now that sleep medicine was involved for sure. Many of the statements, and even parts of Kate's book, make suspicious and unnecessary references to the kids "being drugged". They took such medicines with them, and they were photographed to have been in reach of the children even if not given directly. So I think Maddie either died of an overdose, or else had an accident (fell off the back of the sofa) while in distress and unsupervised. This likely happened on or around the Tuesday, as all the supposed evidence of Maddie being alive after that point is heavily suspect.
The so-called "last photo", showing Maddie was alive on the day of the abduction, didn’t appear from the McCanns until 3 weeks after the event. This was after they claimed to have handed over all the photos. The convincing theory I’ve heard is that it was an earlier photo from the holiday, with the meta-data altered to fiddle the date. The weather particularly is in stark contrast to what it would have been that time of day according to reports, and even Kate's own book. It was chilly, yet they are all obviously hot, it was sunny, Gerry wears sunnies, and they are all in shorts. It’s downright suspicious, if not incriminating. I’ve heard this alone would carry a serious criminal charge if shown to be the case.
Who wants to play lie detector?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum