Madeiline McCann coverup

[robvalue]

What has been done is very clever, but it’s also heinous. The British government has managed to avoid prosecuting the McCanns, on the basis that they can convince most of the general public that there isn’t enough evidence. I’ll explain how.

I think the most single, damning piece of evidence is the dried bodily fluids collected from the boot of the McCann's rental car. The fact that there were any at all, which have been able to congeal on the side of the boot's fabric, is extremely difficult to explain away. How could that possibly happen? The child is supposedly in the hands of kidnappers. Were they carrying something in the boot of the car that contained some sort of solution which contained Maddie's DNA in it? They have never claimed to have such a thing, and they’d surely have presented this in their defence by now.

Even if we disregard both the cadaver and blood dogs alerting to this area, I think dried bodily fluids on the car fabric from a child supposedly kidnapped several weeks earlier is sufficient evidence of some sort of conspiracy. I think any court would agree, without some really good explanation of how it got there. Remember, this is a rental car, which they did not get until after the disappearance.

But, no prosecution. Not even any investigation into their possible guilt. You’d think they’d be happy to be officially cleared, if they were innocent. Let's examine how they have been able to get away with this, by keeping enough of the general public misinformed so as to stop mass outrage.

Here are the hard facts:

Dried bodily fluid was found on the fabric of the car boot.
It is a legal match for Maddie, under UK law (15/19 peaks).

Here is how this information has been portrayed, via the English crime lab, to the media:

Dried bodily fluid was found on the fabric of the car boot.
It is a match for Maddie, but it is a "low grade" sample. (1)
The sample shares over 99% of its information with every person on the planet. (2)
The McCanns say publicly that, "there was no bodily fluid present", and are unchallenged. (3)

(1) This is true, but irrelevant. A "low grade" sample is where some of the crucial information has deteriorated and so can’t be used. 15/19 of the peaks remain for testing. Out of those 15, all of them match Maddie. So it remains a legal match for Maddie. Most people won’t know this without doing a lot of research, which is exactly the point.

(2) This is true, but irrelevant. It’s a fact that over 99% of DNA is the same between all humans. DNA testing concerns itself with the tiny section of DNA that differs, and is unique to each person. This is inserted to downplay the significance of the finding.

(3) This is true, but irrelevant. Of course there were no actual fluids upon investigation by the police; by that time, they had dried into the fabric. They wouldn’t stay fluids forever. But they are confirmed to have been from bodily fluids. Allowing this to stand is allowing the public to be willingly misinformed about the findings.