RE: Madeiline McCann coverup
October 31, 2018 at 3:15 pm
(This post was last modified: October 31, 2018 at 3:21 pm by robvalue.)
This is the report from the lab about the sample found in the car:
This is exactly what I was saying. Once you remove all the complete unnecessary bullshit from this "explanation", you end up with 15 out of 19 matches for Maddie. The rest of this is utter nonsense to confuse the reader. The conclusion is that it is a legal match. It makes no difference about the parents or other contributors. If 15 are matched up, then that’s enough in a British court of law. This is an erroneous conclusion from someone who has obviously been told to make it look like the McCanns are innocent. There are ways of eliminating the other people from the analysis.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm
Go to 21:50 in this video for evidence.
Quote:A complex LCN DNA result which appeared to have originated from at least three people was obtained from cellular material recovered from the luggage compartment section 286C 2007 CRL10 (2) area 2. Within the DNA profile of Madeline McCann there are 20 DNA components represented by 19 peaks on a chart. At one of the areas of DNA we routinely examine Madeleine has inherited the same DNA component from both parents; this appears therefore as 1 peak rather than 2, hence 19 rather than 20. Of these 19 components 15 are present within the result from this item; there are 37 components in total. There are 37 components because there are at least 3 contributors; but there could be up to five contributors. In my opinion therefore this result is too complex for meaningful interpretation/inclusion.
This is exactly what I was saying. Once you remove all the complete unnecessary bullshit from this "explanation", you end up with 15 out of 19 matches for Maddie. The rest of this is utter nonsense to confuse the reader. The conclusion is that it is a legal match. It makes no difference about the parents or other contributors. If 15 are matched up, then that’s enough in a British court of law. This is an erroneous conclusion from someone who has obviously been told to make it look like the McCanns are innocent. There are ways of eliminating the other people from the analysis.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm
Go to 21:50 in this video for evidence.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum