HELL or not HELL?

[Angrboda]

I pointed out that to refute the existence of certain Christian concepts of hell, namely that hell consists only in separation from God, you would need to prove that the Christian God doesn't exist.  I haven't seen you do any such thing.  As someone who claims that hell doesn't exist, that would seem to be a priority.  Why haven't you?

When I was a kid and I was forced to go to church by my parents the priests were saying very very clearly that hell is a place where sinners are burned which is far from the idea that hell is a separation from God.
These days some among the Roman church have in part changed the music by saying that hell is a separation from God.
Every day so to speak we hear a new story.
Tomorrow we may even hear a total different story.
Who knows?

Who knows? Certainly not you.

In any case God has absolutely nothing to do with all religious dogmas invented by the clergy.

What can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.

Why should I prove that the Christian God does not exist?

Already explained. If the Christian God exists, and hell is separation from God, then hell exists. You can't prove that there doesn't exist separation from God, so your only argument against this kind of hell is to prove that the Christian God doesn't exist. Get cracking, slacker!

Christians and Muslims can go on and on with their dogmas as far as they like and at the same time believe in God.

I could give a shit what you believe without evidence or argument. You think atheists are dogmatic. You are wrong. You think you aren't dogmatic. You are wrong. You think a lot of stupid shit. Nobody cares.