What sort of BAC should be present before someone is considered too drunk to fuck? Would it generally be assumed to be .08 like the driving limit?
Before anyone asks, This is not in any way meant to be a rhetorical question. I honestly think that with a rule like that, guidelines for what counts as "too intoxicated to consent" need to be made if there's supposed to be any sort of meaningful standard. I mean, I can see where the standard is coming from, and if it's clear that the intoxicated person is passed out or is so far out of it they can't tell what's even happening, then they can't really consent to sex. Beyond that, I'm not sure how meaningful such a statement can even be. That could just be the ASD talking, but it looks like between "first drink" and "too wasted to know what's going on" there exists a big grey area where consent may or may not be possible and I'd like to know where the limits really are.
Before anyone asks, This is not in any way meant to be a rhetorical question. I honestly think that with a rule like that, guidelines for what counts as "too intoxicated to consent" need to be made if there's supposed to be any sort of meaningful standard. I mean, I can see where the standard is coming from, and if it's clear that the intoxicated person is passed out or is so far out of it they can't tell what's even happening, then they can't really consent to sex. Beyond that, I'm not sure how meaningful such a statement can even be. That could just be the ASD talking, but it looks like between "first drink" and "too wasted to know what's going on" there exists a big grey area where consent may or may not be possible and I'd like to know where the limits really are.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
