RE: WW2 Tanks.... A question....
December 4, 2018 at 11:53 am
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2018 at 12:02 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(December 4, 2018 at 11:45 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:(December 4, 2018 at 11:35 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: I see your puny 11 inch gun that shoots pitiful chemical explosive shells and can’t leave railway tracks, and I raise you a 16.25” gun that shoots nuclear shells and on mounted on cross country tracked chassis.
No problem, I'll just be on the other side of a river. Those things won't get across a bridge.
![[Image: 2B1+Oka+2.jpg]](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xcMRFiCgHUM/UuCePUSIPpI/AAAAAAAASfs/TX7FZqbMD5A/s1600/2B1+Oka+2.jpg)
Better stay 16 mile ballistic range plus 2 mile blast radius from the river, plus however many miles of fallout zone, provided the wind is blowing across the river from the gun.
(December 4, 2018 at 11:43 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: I'd just like to say that I'd rather be in a Jagdpanther lying in wait than in any of the tanks approaching me. Just sayin'.
I prefer British Archer tank destroyer. It’s like a jagdpanther, but with the gun pointed backwards over the engine deck. That way I can shoot and then runaway without even having to shift into reverse, and the driver can see where I am running away to.
