RE: More Quantum entanglement mind fuckery
December 8, 2018 at 6:55 pm
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2018 at 6:56 pm by bennyboy.)
Nono, I'm not trying to say QM is wrong or champion classic physics explanations or anything. Qm entanglement gives me a hard-on, especially the stuff they did with larger atoms.
I find QM's descriptions of the observer effect, QM entanglement, the quantum eraser and so-on compelling. I was just agreeing with Cherub to the degree that we may not ever have access to that layer of observation which would explain WHY any of that stuff is the way it is. As I said, we can describe it, but we may never really get to look under the hood.
Friends?
I find QM's descriptions of the observer effect, QM entanglement, the quantum eraser and so-on compelling. I was just agreeing with Cherub to the degree that we may not ever have access to that layer of observation which would explain WHY any of that stuff is the way it is. As I said, we can describe it, but we may never really get to look under the hood.
Friends?
