Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?

[T0 Th3 M4X]

Next up:

Duck Season vs Rabbit Season

---

Atheist argument 3.1 - The Daffy Duck Logical Fallacy

Nope more your is silly and makes zero sense and no amount of saying "that's your opinion" changes that.

And it's not a fallacy to state a fact when it is a fact that it's a silly statement to say atheists prove god

---

And you don't make any sense.  But it's okay for yourself and anybody you can convince that your nonsense is a piece of gold.  Aside from that, everybody else should bring a shovel.

Nope the opposite your statement was what was nonsense and he doesn't need to convince anyone of this as it's clear that it was a nonsense statement and it is gold while your statement retains it's status as nonsense .

---

t implies the existence of it conceptually.  I thought we already went through this.   If you suggest it exists naturally, then that's a whole different category.  If you say it exists supernaturally, that's  also another category.  More than likely, we would use different means for identifying and assessing each based on the category it falls under.   If you don't think that's fair, then feel free to disagree.  If not, then how would you suggest we assess evidence for anything categorized as being supernatural?

This presumes concepts have any external reality and this assumes that ant such category exists and that it requires a whole new standard. not to mention this seems like a get out of evidence free card.

---

Nope.  There are clearly three separate categories.  Conceptualized existence (Regarded in thought as existing), natural existence (Something observable in the natural world), and supernatural existence (supersedes natural existence).   No card here, but there's no purpose of providing evidence on something if there's no explanation of what would be considered evidence.