(December 27, 2018 at 1:32 am)Amarok Wrote:Quote:Nope. There are clearly three separate categories.It implies that such a category exist
Quote:Conceptualized existence (Regarded in thought as existing),
Which does not mean it's a thing separate existence
Quote:natural existence (Something observable in the natural world),So an actual category we know exists
Quote:and supernatural existence (supersedes natural existenceAssuming any such category exists and requires a separate standard
Quote:No card here, but there's no purpose of providing evidence on something if there's no explanation of what would be considered evidence.Yeah see they above and again this is again seemingly a attempt at making assertions evidence free. It assumes it the disbelievers job to define the evidence but it's not .
So you just repeated the same thing over again
Then it ends up in a stalemate. You want evidence, but I don't know what you consider evidence.
If I'm in a court room and a judge wants evidence, I would need to know what he or she considers evidence, or they would just dismiss everything that didn't meet their standard.