(December 27, 2018 at 1:19 pm)Grandizer Wrote:(December 27, 2018 at 1:14 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: "The concept of the supernatural proposes the existence of things that are inexplicable by scientific understanding of the laws of nature."
Philosophically speaking, that definition is not sufficient enough to tell us exactly what the supernatural really is. What does it mean to be positively supernatural? And what does it mean for something to be necessarily supernatural if it is inexplicable by scientific understanding of the laws of nature?
Good enough definition for the dictionary, but not good enough for a proper philosophy discussion.
Right, and I agree. But if someone is asking for "evidence" this needs to be established so as to be able to provide whatever would be deemed necessary to be considered evidence. That's what we're working on.
