Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?

[Amarok]

Nope it's a victory for the nonbeliever as the asserter as produced nothing to back their assertion and the unconvinced can go along their merry way 

If a you show up in court make up a bunch of assertions the judge is a allowed to simply throw the the case out .

---

P zombies are rubbish 


Which in no way makes us not conscience 


We also have those

Another idiot who take P zombies seriously

Not at all. The question/op was faulty as-is.  It's not about win-lose.  It's about gaining something, and nobody gains anything if the question isn't fully defined.  You can't readily provide something to someone if you don't know what it is they want.  That should be common sense.


Q: I need a screwdriver. Can you get me one? (Insufficient)
A: What kind of screwdriver? (Request for sufficiency)
A2: I need a #4 Phillips (Request is sufficient for a proper response)

Let's rewrite this 

C: This thing exist 
Q: Really can provide ant evidence that it exist 
R: No you need to leap through hoops to define evidence blah blah blah 
R:So the answer is no then . I'll be on my way then

---

Maybe, but if it supersedes the natural, then it could potentially dictate said laws and processes

Right superpowers solve everything 

So that brings me back to my original question about what would be considered evidence. 

Not our problem 

What is it I would need to provide to be considered evidence?  If I don't know what counts as evidence per the OP, it would be silly for me to assume something, or I would just be told, "Well that's not acceptable evidence."

None of this is our problem