(December 28, 2018 at 11:28 am)Gae Bolga Wrote:(December 28, 2018 at 10:49 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: I already pointed it out. I didn't assert any evidence. Do you want the technical name for the fallacy?
No reason to attempt to provide something that isn't adequately defined. In this case "evidence", it would be a waste of time trying to pick and choose what might be considered adequate. If it's not objective, then I'm not interested. If someone else is, then target them for it.
Yes, max...for the third time, lol...can you identify whatever logical fallacy you think you were dealing with in the quoted text?
What are you talking about, not adequately defined? Can you identify what it is, precisely, that makes the definition of the term evidence inadequate?
No need to rage dude. It makes more sense to state the actual fallacy rather than state the specific name of the fallacy. Must be an atheist thing.
