(December 28, 2018 at 8:12 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(December 28, 2018 at 7:33 pm)Amarok Wrote: No he's not and it's not even his problem
Well then you answer it.
If he can't substantiate the question, I'm not wasting my time with it. Has nothing to do with you or you opinion.
(December 28, 2018 at 7:36 pm)polymath257 Wrote: Why do you say that? I said what it means for something to be evidence. That is what you asked for. What else are you wanting?
Specifics on what would count as evidence for a supernatural? I can't think of any because I haven't seen enough discussion of the supposed properties of a supernatural to determine what sorts of evidence would justify the conclusion that such exists.
If nothing can be considered, then no point in providing anything.
I didn't say nothing can be considered. I said I didn't know of any sort of evidence that would support the concept. perhaps you can enlighten me.