(December 29, 2018 at 10:03 am)Grandizer Wrote: T0 Th3 M4X, just give us what you think is good enough evidence for supernaturalism, and let us judge if it makes for good evidence or not. When you continue to not provide anything to evaluate, then we're justified in thinking you're dodging the challenge because you aren't able to meet it (because there is no conclusive evidence for God).
Think I'm wrong? Make an effort, and provide the evidence. Or just be humble and admit you don't have [good] evidence for God but that you just choose to believe in God only because it makes sense to you. If you say that, I'll have a lot of respect for you because nothing is more pleasing than when the person I'm interacting with is being as intellectually honest as one can be.
Sorry, I don't play this game and I already explained why. I'm not required to provide you anything. If I'm wrong, what am I required to provide? By what authority do I have that requirement?
Unless you state what evidence would need to be, then you can't accomplish anything because there's no way to examine/confirm anything objectively.
#1 If I give you a stick, and you say the stick wasn't good enough, then it's dismissed on the basis of subjectivity.
#2 If you say you need a stick, and I hand you a stick, then that's it. It's objective. Either I handed you a stick or I didn't.
#2 is how I operate, which is why I said I will only humor the question if it's done objectively. If not, I have 0 interest and will gladly exit he conversation. Cheers.