RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
December 30, 2018 at 2:30 am
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2018 at 2:42 am by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(December 30, 2018 at 12:24 am)Rahn127 Wrote: I need a supernatural stick.
Can you show me one ?
In your dreams.
(December 30, 2018 at 1:07 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote:(December 30, 2018 at 12:34 am)ResoluteBaptist Wrote: I have all the evidence you ever need.
Come on down to the mountains of East Tennessee. Hike up there early in the morning stand on the edge of the cliff and listen to the birds chirping, watch the foxes darting through the grass and watch the sun rise, poking his bright little head out from behind the clouds.
You look at that and tell me the lord God doesn't exist. Go on and do it!
While others have already adressed the theme of this post.
Hello!BTW.
I'll just add.
If there is a diety? They got some e'splainin' ta do.
Not at work.
In what you see as "ugly", others find beauty in.
It's not the creation that's the problem in and of itself. It's the self-determination that is instilled within us, and the misuse of it.
(December 29, 2018 at 11:12 am)Gwaithmir Wrote:(December 28, 2018 at 9:45 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: I never asserted that I would provide evidence. Additionally, I never offered anything as evidence. His statement assumes that I did or that it was insufficient.
To this point is is something that is on the table for consideration, but I'm not going to go in circles about something being evidence if it can't be viewed objectively. If not, there's no point to it, because it can simply be implied that the evidence wasn't acceptable. If it's defined ahead of time, then I have criteria for any evidence I would need to assert if I choose to.
Evidence consists of observations and experimental results that serve to support, refute, or modify a hypothesis or theory when collected and rationally scrutinized according to the scientific method. I think everyone here will agree that these are the criteria for determining if what you wish to present can be judged to be valid evidence.
Now, make your case.
We've already been through this in this thread. If the needed evidence isn't stated as what it would need to be beforehand so that it's objective, I have 0 interest. If you have evidence counter to it, then I would reconsider, but claim no responsibility beyond what I just stated. What you believe or are convinced that everybody else thinks has no bearing on it, because it's not a position of authority, so I have no requirement to respond to it. It's not because I don't care, but because it would be frivolous for me to humor the question any other way.
Now make your case.