(December 30, 2018 at 6:23 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
(December 30, 2018 at 5:34 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: All people are selective. I don't intentionally dismiss things out of ignorance. Unfortunately, it's not always feasible to respond to everything because of time limitations, and I'm bouncing between this and other things. I would think it would be more problematic if I refused to respond to all statements or questions directed at me. I do what I can, and if that's not good enough, then sorry. But equally, I don't expect you, or anybody else, to respond to everything I say.
Your complaint about definitions is false, and even more so ridiculous. If you won't accept a definition from a dictionary, then I'm not the one being biased. It would make more sense to evaluate the definition as provided by the dictionary, and then list any quarrels you might have if you felt the definition was insufficient. More times than not, I'll use dictionary.com or M-W. I also can't imagine that there are too many people that would suggest either have an intrinsic bias, but then again, I suppose I could be wrong.
I stand by my comments regarding your posting history, to which I am sure others will attest.
As for time consraintscin posting? This is why I add my current status as a heading or footnote.
As for dictionaries? As has been explained to you before they are only descriptive of the language in common parlance. Hence the yearly revisions, additions and reletions.
While, yet again, we see your behaviour on display with yet again the selective obfuscational reply given to myself.
Ahhh, okay. Again, I don't care about the opinion of you and your clan. If it has some special meaning to you, then congrats.
Got it. Now the atheists don't believe in dictionaries. *rolls eyes*
As I said, it was an offer. If you have nothing, then expect nothing. In light of that, can you stop with the pandering?
