(December 31, 2018 at 2:48 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(December 31, 2018 at 2:39 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Then reveiw the links provided and plug Rahn127's figures into Google to back track and fact check them, M4X.
For some one who states they are "Interested in things that are objective."
There has been a derth of such when folks have asked for such the same from yourself, M4X.
You were the one asked, and you keep avoiding it. I've gotten about a dozen reasons as to why you can't be objective.
Sounds to me like you just want to run around in circles, but I can't say for sure why you are doing it. Seems to be a trend around here.
So, since you comepltely missed the more salient points of my previous posts.
1) I was at work.
2) I was at work.
3) I was other wise productivly occupied in my place of employment.
Others have also replied and added to my initial comment to Angelina so you can also peruse their information.
What exaclty is it you wish clarified M4X?
The archeological and anthropoligical dates? Look them up. I had some brief time for a Googe search to get the rough guestimates I innitially posted.
An actual archeological or anthropological page will give you better and more concise numbers than my untrained in the field self.
As for more rescent history?
The date is 2018 where you are M4X? You know how we got to said numbering sytem, right?
As for Danelaw?
It's even older than my memory served me. Being instigated in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle for the year 876.
So... a non Christian institution that still has some infulence in law books to this day.
As for myself being 'Objective' towards yourself M4X?
Please, offer me a reason or suggestion as to why I should be so forth coming towards yourself?
Not at work.