(December 31, 2018 at 1:42 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:(December 31, 2018 at 1:28 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: - I didn't just "state something" just because. If you claim I did, then prove it.
Ok then, this is what you said.
"It's actually a true statement, but inconclusive to many people who choose not to understand."
That was the whole thing, just a basic assertion with nothing to back it up. In fact you have never actually provided anything that anyone could look at tell what you think god is or how it did its whatever have you.
Quote:- So because you had an emotional experience, you chose to discount something. Got it.
I'm sorry, what are you referring to?
Quote:- What you attempted is known as Whataboutism, or the tu quoque fallacy. Of course you mixed it in with a false premise.
So I'm supposed to assert information about an assertion I didn't make. Got it again. You are a most assuredly a genius, but in your own mind. *rolls eyes*
What you are doing is evading all my questions.
I have not pointed and said "what about such and such" I have just asked for evidence or coherent definitions.
Your continued non-supply of either is the issue.
So do you have a coherent definition of god and evidence to back it up or not?
I wasn't "just stating something" for no reason, and I didn't suggest any or all people must accept my statement. However, many people, and not just Christians, see it as cause and effect. So the effect is seen as evidence. Do I expect you to assume that as evidence? No. I expect you to decide for yourself.
I'm not going out of my way to evade any of your questions, but a lot of them are separate issues, and they are a distraction to what is being discussed. If the focal point goes from one or two, to five or more, it can significantly complicate the discussion. I'm happy to respond to things, but I know for me personally, my head is going to get a bit frazzled from trying to address too many things at once.