RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
January 1, 2019 at 6:54 pm
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2019 at 6:59 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(January 1, 2019 at 4:34 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 1, 2019 at 4:18 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Fortunately, the world runs on correct explanations, not easy ones. Creationism explains nothing, makes no predictions, and can't be shown to be correct. This is not the case with biological evolution.
Boru
Creationism attempts to explain creation. How someone applies or responds to it can vary.
It's more problematic for atheist who explain nothing in terms of science. The best they've been able to come up in "something from nothing" and "inorganic forming into organic, then increasing in complexity." Modern science implies these ideas are nonsense and are not observable in light of the Law of Conservation of Mass, and Biogenesis.
Creationism doesn't attempt to explain anything. It is a statement of belief, not an explanation.
There is no 'law of biogenesis'. What Pasteur et al did was to disprove a variety of creationism. There are, however, intriguing hypotheses concerning the transition from molecular evolution to the first protocells.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax