(January 6, 2019 at 9:14 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote:(January 6, 2019 at 8:46 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Scientific Journals aren't always accurate. That is why you'll often see subsequent studies to check or expand on things. That is one of the reasons why we use the scientific method. It allows us to proof things even once there are claims about something.That... is just such a huge amount of fallacious twaddle...
But you know, like a lot of atheists say, we are a product of the environment. Yep, how did that work out for the Lemmings? If that were true, even scientists and journals would be a product of the environment.
So, you're just posting for the giggles, right?
Helping people get their smiles on for the day?
Not at all. Scientific studies aren't meant to be exhaustive and are open to correction. Part of the reason for peer review is we can look at potential problems with the research or maybe even how to expand on it. Peer review is limited in scope though. Once you make information public, you have more eyes on it that may see an angle that wasn't accounted for or implications for future studies. We always have to assume that there is more, because there probably is. That's why we use old research to build on new research.
Anyway, you had no choice but to ask, because of being a product of the environment and all, just like you will have to respond to this since nature demands it.