(January 6, 2019 at 9:58 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Not at all. Scientific studies aren't meant to be exhaustive and are open to correction. Part of the reason for peer review is we can look at potential problems with the research or maybe even how to expand on it. Peer review is limited in scope though. Once you make information public, you have more eyes on it that may see an angle that wasn't accounted for or implications for future studies. We always have to assume that there is more, because there probably is. That's why we use old research to build on new research.
Anyway, you had no choice but to ask, because of being a product of the environment and all, just like you will have to respond to this since nature demands it.
Okay...
So.. how does the scientific method make it 'Wrong', then?
So what if I am a product of my environment?
You seem to be indicating that this leads to 'Deity' by fiat... some how?
Must admit your posting style leaves me more often puzzled than not.
Not at work.