Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy

[Angrboda]

You're conflating the multiple versions of atheism in order to create a straw man. Atheists who lack belief because there is no evidence are not asserting the claim that no gods exist, and so they are not making the argument from ignorance that you suggest. Strong atheists who do assert that gods do not exist often use other arguments to support their assertion. I'm sure that there are some, perhaps even a surprisingly large number of strong atheists who hold that no gods exist because there isn't any evidence for them. In some cases, that's merely a symptom of their inability to identify the other reasons besides lack of evidence which they are unconsciously drawing upon. However, I'm sure your argument validly describes some atheists. In that respect, your OP is simply wrong because some atheists doesn't define what atheism per se is, especially if they are in the minority. The real error you made in your OP is attributing the argument from ignorance fallacy to weak atheists, who simply do not believe, rather than strong atheists for whom it might be a problem. It's such moronic missteps which pretty much consign you to the category of unintentional troll.

Watching the video after having made my remarks, I note that the video gets it right in the exact way that you do not. Which just goes to show that you are so buttfuckingly stupid that you can't even follow a 1-1/2 minute video on elementary logic correctly without making a major blunder.