Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy

[Agnostico]

So, if I told you that I spent last night locked in passion with a three-boobed bisexual fairy from Pluto, the Bad Breath fairy, and a self aware toilet brush named Bernard, you would believe me because I make the claim but can't back it up with evidence?
If you say "yes", I question your integrity.
If you say no, I'll still question your integrity on the bais of your previous statements.
But let's take it a step further.  I not only want people to believe me but for them to send me money because teleporting from Pluto is bloody expensive.
Would you dig into your wallet to help me based solely on my word?

Ye it seems that way. Il get slammed if I say yes or no.
Ive asked questions and given my theories and views. The only thing I claim to know is that I don't know.
What previous statements r u referring to that makes u doubt my integrity? What part of my agnostic answer to God do u disagree with?

Then independent conformation or third person perspective you find unnecessary. Interesting.
What the hell you doing on the internet/forum then?

Its not that i find a confirmation or thrid person perspective unneccessary.
I find a response to theist claims to be unnecessary and counter productive.. A hinderance to thought and knowledge.
I think its fair to say that a 3rd persons view, a theist perspective, is neccessary to become an atheist?
Ive said why am I here. To understand the hate and dogma coming from atheists among other things.