If you believe in something without evidence - then that means you are believing when there's no indication of the truth of that belief WHATSOEVER how can that be rational?
If Faith is defined as THAT - how can that be rational?
Sure. You are more than welcome to start a thread on the matter if that's the case
So the clarify...you are a gnostic atheist? You believe God is DISProved or you claim to absolutely know he doesn't exist?
If that IS the case then rather than debate here perhaps you'd like to start a thread on the matter as I suggested - if you're always ready to reopen the debate as you say?
EvF
If Faith is defined as THAT - how can that be rational?
(May 28, 2009 at 12:24 pm)josef rosenkranz Wrote: I believe in the direct version of denying the existence of God and have in previous posts expressed my view of how to demonstrate that. But infortunately I have nor found sufficient members of this forum to agree with my views.
I'm always ready to reopen the debate.
Sure. You are more than welcome to start a thread on the matter if that's the case

So the clarify...you are a gnostic atheist? You believe God is DISProved or you claim to absolutely know he doesn't exist?
If that IS the case then rather than debate here perhaps you'd like to start a thread on the matter as I suggested - if you're always ready to reopen the debate as you say?
EvF