RE: When Different Species Cooperate For The Greater Good
April 11, 2019 at 6:24 am
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2019 at 7:09 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(April 11, 2019 at 5:29 am)Little lunch Wrote: I didn't mean he was going to eat the Rhino.
He was going to make money off it and feed his family.
Someone else, higher up, was going to make a lot more money off it.
Well that human's death would have felt even better.
I'm sure he had other choices.
I just don't like the fact that none of us know his situation, but we're applauding his death.
Valuing an animal's life over a human's life.
Make sense to you?
Fine.
Couldn't he have just made the money to feed his family by killing some other animal, one that isn't critically endangered and living in a protected area?
Rhino poaching is an extremely high risk venture. If the man was thinking of his family, maybe he could have picked something with a lower chance of being killed and eaten by wild animals in an area where he shouldn't have been in the first place. Because of his decision to try and poach a rhino, his family have lost their breadwinner. He was committing a criminal act that was the result of stupid choices, no matter how noble his motives may have been.
And look at it this way - if the elephant hadn't killed him, the lions might not have eaten that day. Circle of life and all that.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax