(October 10, 2011 at 8:25 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: He was a tyrant? Now tell that to his supporters. Because he certainly has as much supporters as the rebels(with proof that the Al Qaeda was in league with the rebels).
Any tyrant has supporters, that does not mean they are right. His people wanted to reform, what did he do? Bomb his own people.
Quote:This shit too, is about oil. I'm sure that after Qaddafi is gone, the oil will be privatized, and sold for half the amount that Qaddafi sold it to the westerners.Yes, but perhaps some of this income will go to help the people, instead of filling the vanity's pockets of a'dictator'
Quote:Qaddafi was against western imperialism. True, he was a dictator.The right to speak up and manifest when things are wrong. the right to vote in whatever I see fit. It may not be a perfect system, but its better than the alternatives.
But what good is a democracy that was brought to you by the west?
Quote:The promise of democracy, is an empty one, especially if it's made by western governments. Instead of providing relief for the people that died in the clashes, the west chooses to provide the rebels with weapons, in order to accelerate the clashes. The rule of Qaddafi, whose rule was all about keeping the oil firmly in Libyan hands, is much more preferrable to the imperialist rule of the west.
You know very little about military strategy, don't you? The faster you resolve a conflict, the less casualties it bears? Where is the invading force?
And why are you defending a despot idiot?
