Is Moral Nihilism a Morality?

[DLJ]

During a recent romp through Wikipedia, I discovered an interesting passage:

Moral nihilism, also known as ethical nihilism, is the meta-ethical view that morality does not exist as something inherent to objective reality; therefore no action is necessarily preferable to any other. For example, a moral nihilist would say that killing someone, for whatever reason, is not inherently right or wrong.

Other nihilists may argue not that there is no morality at all, but that if it does exist, it is a human construction and thus artificial, wherein any and all meaning is relative for different possible outcomes. As an example, if someone kills someone else, such a nihilist might argue that killing is not inherently a bad thing, or bad independently from our moral beliefs, because of the way morality is constructed as some rudimentary dichotomy. What is said to be a bad thing is given a higher negative weighting than what is called good: as a result, killing the individual was bad because it did not let the individual live, which was arbitrarily given a positive weighting. In this way a moral nihilist believes that all moral claims are void of any truth value. An alternative scholarly perspective is that moral nihilism is a morality in itself. Cooper writes, "In the widest sense of the word 'morality', moral nihilism is a morality."

I found this rather thought-provoking (the last bit that said "moral nihilism is a morality"). This seems to suggest that moral realism may be inescapable... because every brand of moral skepticism carries with it some undercurrent of moral thinking.

Any thoughts on this?

As with most if not all Philosophy-related pages I’ve read on Wikipedia, they seem to go astray after the word “therefore”.

This one goes wrong sooner by equating “moral” with “ethical”.

The whole thing is plagued with the disease of ‘weak semantics’.

Indeed, killing someone is not intrinsically right or wrong but it is contextually right or wrong.
And morals do exist and so do ethics.
And nihilism is still correct.

Nihilism relates to the physical stance whereas essentialism (its Buddhist antithesis) relates to the manifest image / intentional stance.