(June 26, 2019 at 6:53 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote:(June 26, 2019 at 5:29 pm)DLJ Wrote: Yup. Again, weak semantics is the issue here.
Are you up for a conversation aimed at tightening up those semantics in order to arrive at an explanatory “framework that is independent of opinion”?
Maybe. But I already have a word for that framework that is independent of opinion. I call it "reality." What do you call it? (Just trying to get the semantics right.)
Ha! That’s a good place to start. I’ll go with that.
Next, how shall we account for / describe the different perspectives of reality?
Should there be a distinction between ‘reality’ and say, ‘virtual reality’? Or physical vs. logical etc. ?
The PURPOSE of life is to replicate our DNA ................. (from Darwin)
The MEANING of life is the experience of living ... (from Frank Herbert)
The VALUE of life is the legacy we leave behind ..... (from observation)
The MEANING of life is the experience of living ... (from Frank Herbert)
The VALUE of life is the legacy we leave behind ..... (from observation)