The Adam & Eve Myth - Origins

[Drich]

Um no.  

The ability to regurgitate old mythology only proves you repeat what you are sold.

Moron, these are my life experiences... nowhere in the bible are these experiences found in one place... nothing I lived through was matched or mirrored by anyone directly... so wft are you talking about??? oh, right you people are not smart enough to speak to specifics so you speak in gross generalities and assume all religion is alike. for instance:

Hindu's will "testify" to the "truth" of Brahma and Vishnu. Muslims will "testify" to the "truth" of Allah.

How exactly can they do this aside from blind faith moron? they can't extoll anything I have shared unless they themselves claim to be prophets like muhammad himself or some sort of liaison or emissary. Their own religion teaches this and also teaches to kill those who claim to be prophets as allaha is not taking on any new prophets (which a few hundred years after moham died he did and the religion split/or those where the false prophets alaha warned mo-ham about and they split the religion (depending on which sect you grew up in)

Do you see the problem here? you in your hate of God do not even know enough about the various religious basic to make an accurate comparison. you assume we are all the same when in fact only Christian puts people in direct contact with their God with no one in between to filter interprete or tell how to think.

And I cannot begin to tell you how many si fi fans will "testify" the "truth" that Gene Roddenberry invented the modern cell phone.

again dummy the point is falsifiable testimony. the fact that we can check that testimony is what makes it valuable. we can discern whether it is true or not by what is said. like wise we can test the testimonies of Christian and see if they are truthful or not!

You know what claims are like. Everyone has one.

a life story? yes and mine put me before God in such a way I can also tell you how o do the same.

And if "testimony" were always "fact" in real courts there would be no need for perjury laws.

---

[/quote we don't need pre jury law. most of the time a tesimony will even cause a defendant to admit what he did and cop a plea.

[quote]And in real courts, if is proven that even if the witness truly believes what they think they saw, it can be dead wrong at the same time.

again moron it is the falsifiability that is important here. Ie yes one can be proven wrong. what about 2.2 billion?

The ability to make claims is nothing. Someone can truly believe what they claim, and be dead wrong at the same time.

again I made no claim. I shared a part of my life's story. you can believe it or not. the point being made is what God can do to help establish and maintain a open relationship with his people. meaning what I experienced is shared or can be by everyone here to one degree or another.