(July 31, 2019 at 9:17 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: So, for example, those silly sjw would say something like “intelligence isn’t determined by race” and “skeptics” would say, well let’s see if that’s really true, not taking sides, just asking questions.
Just out of curiosity. Did anyone ever ask "Who cares?" as in "Who cares if intelligence is determined by race?" I mean, I don't care. (Not that my opinion matters.)
Quote:A long winded uncritical scientific racism screed would follow.
Just like Leviticus and Numbers. Maybe there really is "nothing new under the sun." YouTube is just the digital version of a bronze age scribe.
Quote:Precisely because the presenters were not identifiable white supremacists, and the presented content was not described as the ravings of white supremacy, many viewers were left with the impression that this content was like any other skeptic content.
I consider essays by David Hume "skeptic content." If YouTube douchebaggery modeling itself as skepticism is how white supremacist ideology propagates itself nowadays, I can only point out that the real problem is that YouTube douchebaggery modeling itself as skepticism is something people consider worthwhile.
Let me tell you two things I know are facts: 1) Spellcheck acknowledges that "douchebaggery" is a word. No problem. I actually misspelled it. But spellcheck said, "No, no. This is how you spell douchebaggery. 2) People are right to accuse me of douchebaggery because I'm going to say I think all this is YouTube stuff is a problem because people take shadows on the wall of a cave to be reality. Sorry, y'all. But I think that's what up. Isn't that what's going on here? Aren't shadows being projected onto a wall and people saying, "OMG! This shit is real!"
Lol. That's what I think is happening. Call me a douchebag all you want.