RE: What do cigarettes cost?
September 6, 2019 at 2:57 pm
(This post was last modified: September 6, 2019 at 2:58 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(September 6, 2019 at 1:36 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(September 6, 2019 at 1:22 pm)Aegon Wrote: I meant him!I have said several times that I am in favor of a public provided health care system - along with private practice - for those that can afford it.
Although now I'm curious if you think those who got lung cancer from a lifetime of smoking should be liable for their treatment costs, even if other cancers may be treated at little to no cost? (Assuming a single-payer system)
Here in the US we are still stuck with the insurance company model ( for those lucky enough to have it).
Do you think the smoker should be liable for their health conditions as related to smoking?
(September 6, 2019 at 1:36 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Yes, I do think they should be so liable. The great majority of cancers are not behaviour-caused, and the link between smoking and lung cancer is pretty well established.Or (here's where it gets fun) lets just figure out per pack - what they should be paying. (The intent of this post)
At the very least, before you're allowed to buy known carcinogens which you have every option not to buy , you should be required to present an insurance card that proves you're covered.
Boru
Lets assume averages. A typical smoker smokes a pack a day - for say - 40 years...
Sound reasonable?
I don't get the question. They should pay whatever the going price is for cigarettes.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax