RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
October 28, 2019 at 5:45 pm
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2019 at 6:22 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 28, 2019 at 4:59 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(October 28, 2019 at 2:54 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: How come you never reply to people who bring up legitimate, fact-based counterpoints?
I do. But when their facts have nothing to do with the subject - I don't.
Nobody - myself included - is trying to sing praises of President Trump. I am not endorsing his fitness to the presidency. I am not defending any of his bad behavior.
I am pointing out what political cunts the ( D )s are being about this operation - which was TEXTBOOK PERFECT - including President Trump keeping a lid on information on a need to know basis. He probably did just get lucky.
But it doesn't excuse Pelosi and the others of her ilk for going straight for Trump's nutsack. It's simply more partisan bullshit.
Perfect in what way? The word is the operation was highly risky and required multiple factors to coincide to offer good chance of greatest success. If it is executed half cocked and failed it would prejudice chances of success of many future operations. The operation had been contemplated since early summer, but was called off several times because conditions are not in impact to ensure success. The condition is still not in place to ensure success, but the Delta force was compelled to execute this operation now because trump's surprise withdrawal precluded the possibility of doing it later at a better time.
In other words, Trump did everything to make the operation fail, by for example effectively surrendering to the czarist Russia and the ottoman empire a century after both of these anachronistic entities went extinct, but the Delta force succeeded anyway, and now it is he, not the Delta force, that is taking a victory lap.
