(October 28, 2019 at 4:59 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(October 28, 2019 at 2:54 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: How come you never reply to people who bring up legitimate, fact-based counterpoints?
I do. But when their facts have nothing to do with the subject - I don't.
Nobody - myself included - is trying to sing praises of President Trump. I am not endorsing his fitness to the presidency. I am not defending any of his bad behavior.
I am pointing out what political cunts the ( D )s are being about this operation - which was TEXTBOOK PERFECT - including President Trump keeping a lid on information on a need to know basis. He probably did just get lucky.
But it doesn't excuse Pelosi and the others of her ilk for going straight for Trump's nutsack. It's simply more partisan bullshit.
Courtesy of FakeMessiah:
Quote: Wrote:Trump actively tried to derail the 3 biggest things that helped take out ISIS leader al-Baghdadi
But a more detailed look at the operation suggests the success came in spite of – and not because of – Trump.
The strike wouldn’t have been possible without three key factors, all of which Trump has tried to derail: a US troop presence in Syria; the Kurdish allies who were abandoned when Trump withdrew US troops; and the US intelligence community that Trump has spent three years attacking.
https://www.businessinsider.my/us-killed...y-2019-10/
How is that not a relevant counterpoint?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
