The code that is DNA

[Abaddon_ire]

Sungula is correct. Anyone can make any claim and it is OK to make any claim.

That stops nobody from observing that the claimant has a burden of proof for said affirmative claim.

For example, I claim that an army of pixies transport your posts to my screen by miraculous means. Prove me wrong.

See how that works?

No libel involved. Do you automatically accept my claim of millions of internet pixies or do you reject it unless I~ provide evidence for such claimed pixies?

Tour plainly strawmanned. Deal with it. That is your problem, not anyone else's.

Sure, mutations are absolutely random. Evolution is not random. Do you even have the vaguest idea why that might be? I bet you don't.

While that wasn't he straw man i was referring to it's still interesting 

And prepare yourself for his whinging and playground taunts .Honestly don't take him seriously .His "calling out" is just butthurt creationist  bawling.

Oh, I am far too old to pay any heed to such bleating.

---

So you guys have proven to no one but yourselves that words have very little meaning or consequence.

Then that includes yours. Thus your god has no meaning or consequence.

Nobody cares unless you can demonstrate your wild claims to be true.

If you could do that you would have done so already. But you have not because you can not.

You must be ok if I categorically state that you are all pedophiles.

Sure. You can state it all you like. Doesn't make it even vaguely true or real. I can state that you are the entity salmonella from planet uncooked chicken in the universe of condemned kitchens. Does that make it true somehow because I just stated it?
.

I won’t offer any proof but it’s sufficient for me to simply declare it
You guys especially Sungula are sickos for being pedos

Amusing, since the religious are notorious for butt barging children, and atheists are notorious for exposing them and bringing them to justice.

Why is it that you are a defender of child abuse?