(April 11, 2020 at 7:31 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:(April 11, 2020 at 7:16 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: How convenient.
Millions of years of human ancestry and evolution are ignored because they don't fit the "religious narrative".
What millions of years are you referring to..? Modern humans appeared -supposedly- some hundreds of thousands of years ago. And it's not like apes were supposed to receive guidance too.
(April 11, 2020 at 7:16 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: You KNOW the truth. You KNOW the facts.
But you ignore them because they don't fit your agenda.
But the religious will just choose to ignore them anyway. And make excuses...
I would call evolution some absolute truth if things like The piltdown man and such didn't happen. Why would anyone waste his time building a sophisticated hoax to support the *fact* of evolution? Anyway, the latter word encompasses lots of things now. I don't deny that we adapt to our environments, though. But life beginning because of random chemical reactions in some rock.. not so much.
(April 11, 2020 at 7:27 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: First off, I reject your premise that god is just.
I already know you reject god altogether, what kind of an answer is that?
My question was, suppose a just god exists, Does that imply guidance ? It's a simple yes/no, pal.
Then, no. A god being just does not imply that that god would necessarily guide its creations.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax