(April 15, 2020 at 10:55 am)Klorophyll Wrote: Hitchens is a journalist
I think Hitchens had been a journalist. By the time he wrote his polemics on (his image of) religion, he was not one any longer.
A journalist is supposed to write in a disinterested way about things that really happened.
Nor was he a philosopher, because philosophers reason as best they can so that later philosophers can evaluate and criticize. That's how philosophy works. But polemics resist criticism, and the people who are taken in by them ignore criticism.
The Hitchens we're talking about has transcended the plane on which mortals are supposed to say true things and make sense. Mormons don't care that Joseph Smith's Egyptology was nonsense. Scientologists don't care that Hubbard wrote third rate science fiction. The people become sacred cows, and what they actually said hardly matters any more. Likewise Hitchens' shoddy scholarship and terrible politics are no longer relevant to the fanboys.
He's a symbol of New Atheist superiority, and it doesn't matter if much of what he said was wrong.
