RE: Trevon Revisited again, unfortunately...
May 8, 2020 at 6:03 pm
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2020 at 6:05 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(May 8, 2020 at 5:28 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(May 8, 2020 at 5:19 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Two armed men confronted an unarmed man for no good reason. The unarmed man fought back and was killed. It took ten weeks for the two men to be arrested and charged.
And you’re bitching about the cinematography?
Boru
Sounds like a lot of editoralizing there boss.....
...
How do you KNOW he was unarmed? How do you KNOW they shot him for no good reason?
We don't know. You are making assumptions then proceeding from that point.
And yes - the crappy nature of the video may be important. We don't know who shot it. It was released by a LAWYER (and bet he has the deceased's family on his speed dial). What bet that he - or a member of his firm will be representing that family in the civil case?
Might these two be guilty?
Sure. Absolutely. Probably.are.
But it really chaps my ass to see the media (and social media including forums) making a truely fair investigation impossible.
I know he was unarmed because of the police report based on a statement by McMichael, who said he searched Arbery and did not find a weapon. A good way to describe someone without a weapon is 'unarmed' - it's fewer letters to type than 'unweaponated'.
I didn't say they shot him for no good reason. I said they confronted him for no good reason. Jogging while black is not a good reason to confront someone. Thinking that a black man maybe kinda sorta looks a little bit like the description of a burglary suspect is not a good reason to confront someone.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax