Trevon Revisited again, unfortunately...

[onlinebiker]

Your level of denialism is hilarious

And BTW - why isn't this all over the news now - and why did GAfollowers (the only source) delete this item?

Because it - like you - was bullshit.

Deny that...

Thank you.

Now you do realize this report contradicts your assessment?

Actually it doesn't 

He said he saw Mr Arbery in video of the house break in.

No it doesn't . The video shows him at a construction site fo 3 minutes which isn't against he law .Nor did he take anything . Also the reports of burglary are all bullshit 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/video-appears-...d=70609635

Arbery’s family's attorneys says they believe the video, obtained by ABC News, does show the former football player inside the under-construction home, but they emphasize that he wasn’t breaking the law.



"Our office has reviewed the surveillance video which appears to show a person, believed to be Ahmaud Arbery, entering a property under construction," the attorneys said in a statement. "The individual remains on the property for under 3 minutes before continuing to jog down the road. This video is consistent with the evidence already known to us. Ahmaud Arbery was out for a jog. He stopped by a property under construction where he engaged in no illegal activity and remained for only a brief period. Ahmaud did not take anything from the construction site. He did not cause any damage to the property."

Ahmaud’s actions at this empty home under construction were in no way a felony under Georgia law. This video confirms that Mr. Arbery’s murder was not justified and the actions of the men who pursued him and ambushed him were unjustified," the statement added.

According to police, the McMichaels say they believed Arbery resembled a suspect allegedly seen breaking into homes in their neighborhood, but police say there have been no reports of burglaries or thefts in that area in nearly two months.

According to multiple media reports - he had prior history with Mr Arbery (which seem prejudicial - so I won't cite) so he knew him by sight.

Which only makes him look worst 

So he was not chasing down a guy simply for running down the street. He was chasing someone he had reason to believe was involved in a burglary - which is legal under Georgia law. (And as I said early in this post - probably a bad idea

He was chasing a guy who had not committed a crime who chased illegally and killed

---

You really are one dumb fuck.

Says the man who needs CNN to identify someone in a picture

Still a dumb cunt...


And making bad assumptions...


The prejudical stuff I did not cite - was NOT prejudical against McGregor.