Trevon Revisited again, unfortunately...

[arewethereyet]

@SUNGULA

I know it's tough to grasp but what I was pointing out is that a older southern man with that type of facial hair and ruddy complexion isn't a rarity.  

Huggy got what I was saying as did others.  

As for the tattoo being removed - that also leaves a mark.

Let me see pics of the forearms.

1. It's not tough to gasp it's just relevant as it not just he features  you listed that convinces me it's him .If that were the case the pictures you posted would be just as convincing . It's all the other features you can make out if you stare long enough . The ridge if the nose even for a separate angle and low quality  is distinct as . The skin isn't just ruddy it's the exact same tone even with the light differences you can make it out enough ( accounting of course for tan and skin age)  and the upper part of the ear has the exact same shape (factoring in compression during photographing and angle )

2. Tattoo removals  don't always leave marks behind it depends on the tattoo and the method of removal . So even a shot of foram would be inconclusive .

Tattoo removal always alters the skin.  Regardless of method or ink color being removed.  When you scar the skin, which is was happens with a tattoo or the removal of one, the skin is altered and there is a different appearance.  For one thing it will not respond the same as surrounding skin to sunlight.  A tattoo on and a tattoo off means the skin has been damaged twice.

Look at the original pictures.  In the mugshot the guys ears are real close to the head.  In the profile pic at the rally, the ear that is showing sticks out from the head rather significantly.

We don't know that it's the same guy and even if it is, his attendance at a rally doesn't mean what he did was racially motivated.  It may look that way but it's not proof.

I will not argue with you.