Quote:So, if I understand you correctly, what you're asking me is whether I acknowledge that the natural world operates independent of God.
Or at least appears to by any mean we can detect
Quote:In response I would say that this proposition (1) is not a scientific one
The above isn't scientific then please show god interacting in some detectable manor to refute methodological naturalism
Quote:, and (2) is in dire need of evidence or valid justification.The above isn't valid then please show god interacting in some detectable manor to refute methodological naturalism
Quote: Does the natural world indeed operate independent of God? I can't acknowledge that it does if I haven't been given any good reason to do so.Have you been good reason to assume it acts dependent on god ? Because nature does not seem to indicate such a dependence .
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
