(August 12, 2020 at 1:22 am)Belacqua Wrote: If you think that there is something in science which proves that something can exist without there being any existence, please let us know. Such a proof would falsify Thomas's argument.
Why do you think science has to address the flawed argument that was designed from the outset to shoehorn god into the beginning of the universe?
The Thomas arguments only utility is to justify god (christian god) for believers. It could just as easily be applied to any other god/creator concept, and still remain a flawed justification.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.