RE: Creationism
August 13, 2020 at 4:49 pm
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2020 at 4:50 pm by GrandizerII.)
(August 13, 2020 at 4:47 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Sure they can, but it's not a non seq because it's silly, it's silly because it's a non seq.
In what way is it a non seq? If cat is God, and cat exists, then God exists is the logical conclusion. Silly premise but whatever.
Quote:Lets just cut right to it. Do you believe that a non seq can be a valid argument? It's not a gotcha, either you do or you don't accept the validity of a non seq.
Irrelevant, but the answer is no (by definition).