Firstoff: could the first cause aka "existence" be a pink unicorn? If so, what is not serious about my question? Why object to my wordplay after Aquinas wordplay? Because it sound less intellectual? If you dont like my description of "existence" as a "pink unicorn", please provide your own, more to the point description or definition of "existence".
Whatever, "existence is the first cause", in a nutshell, correct? Existence causes everything else, not in a temporal matter, but in a logical matter, correct*?
WLC: Please, lets not waste our time with that dishonest clown. Please. regarding that "eternal" part of Plantinga: "eternal" or "eternity" is a temporal concept right?
*this distinction matters, or else we would be stuck with all kinda problems/fallacies, at least thats my understanding
Whatever, "existence is the first cause", in a nutshell, correct? Existence causes everything else, not in a temporal matter, but in a logical matter, correct*?
WLC: Please, lets not waste our time with that dishonest clown. Please. regarding that "eternal" part of Plantinga: "eternal" or "eternity" is a temporal concept right?
*this distinction matters, or else we would be stuck with all kinda problems/fallacies, at least thats my understanding
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
