RE: 'Seeking' God
October 31, 2011 at 5:07 am
(This post was last modified: October 31, 2011 at 5:12 am by 5thHorseman.)
'You're the expert, right?'
You're certainly not. You cherry pick parts of science to suit your cause, which, of course, they don't, as you can't dump in god dunnit without backup. Which you don't have, youre just another wish thinker, scientists are real thinkers they try to find things. Unlike evolution and the big bang theory, your idea it's a theory with NO substance.
Oh, yes Dr Meyer. His friend is Dr Michael Behe and together with Dr Dembski, they came up with intelligent design and irreducible complexity. That worked out well for them.
Kitzmiller vs Dover ring a bell.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/day12pm.html
Meyer and his agenda, that got blew out of the water.
Behe 'the expert' who hadn't read fuck all on some of his claims and didn't like to send his claims to peer reviewed papers. Preferred to just publish his own books. I wonder who would buy them? Christian Americans?
Good scientists let peers review their work.
You're certainly not. You cherry pick parts of science to suit your cause, which, of course, they don't, as you can't dump in god dunnit without backup. Which you don't have, youre just another wish thinker, scientists are real thinkers they try to find things. Unlike evolution and the big bang theory, your idea it's a theory with NO substance.
Oh, yes Dr Meyer. His friend is Dr Michael Behe and together with Dr Dembski, they came up with intelligent design and irreducible complexity. That worked out well for them.
Kitzmiller vs Dover ring a bell.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/day12pm.html
Meyer and his agenda, that got blew out of the water.
Behe 'the expert' who hadn't read fuck all on some of his claims and didn't like to send his claims to peer reviewed papers. Preferred to just publish his own books. I wonder who would buy them? Christian Americans?
Good scientists let peers review their work.
